Title: Under the Banner of Heaven - A Story of Violent Faith
Author: Jon Krakauer
Pages: 339
Genre: Non-fiction
Grade: B
Synopsis: The book mainly focuses on the brutal murders of a woman and her infant daughter in Utah County in 1984. The crimes were committed by LDS Fundamentalists who believed that they were commanded by God to remove those who were getting in the way of God's work. The book discusses other crimes committed both by the mainstream LDS population and Fundamentalist LDS believers, from the kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart to the Mountain Meadows massacre from murders in the Toquerville ward house to rampant sexual abuse and incest in the fundamentalist communities. It really is "a story of violent faith."
My Review: This is a difficult book to review. I've wanted to read it for a long time and finally picked it up at the library. There were parts that were tedious and long-winded but most of the book was very intriguing and enlightening. My biggest complaint is that many of the quotes aren't clearly cited and I often wanted to research something that had been stated in the book. While the book answered many questions it left many unanswered as well. I never felt that this book was anti-Mormon, but quite the opposite in fact. While the facts discussed were often difficult to swallow or depressing to read, I felt that the author was only trying to be as unbiased as possible. There are a lot of things from Church history that the Church is trying to hide, but that I feel should be discussed openly. The only Church history that I've ever read was written by the Church. This book is a view of Church history from the other side.
From the Book: "(p. 3) Balanced atop the highest spire of the Salt Lake Temple, gleaming in the Utah sun, a statue of the angel Moroni stands watch over downtown Salt Lake City with his golden trumpet raised. This massive granite edifice is the spiritual and temporal nexus of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), which presents itself as the world's only true religion. Temple Square is to Mormons what the Vatican is to Catholics, or the Kaaba in Mecca is to Muslims. At last count there were more than eleven million Saints the world over, and Mormonism is the fastest-growing faith in the Western Hemisphere. At present in the United States there are more Mormons than Presbyterians or Episcopalians. On the planet as a whole, there are now more Mormons than Jews. Mormonism is considered in some sober academic circles to be well on its way to becoming a major world religion--the first such faith to emerge since Islam.
"(p. 14) When Debbie was fourteen, she felt "impressed by the Lord" to marry Ray Blackmore, the community leader. Debbie asked her father to share her divine impression with Prophet LeRoy Johnson, who would periodically travel to Bountiful from Short Creek to perform various religious duties. Because Debbie was lithe and beautiful, Uncle Roy approved of the match. A year later the prophet returned to Canada and married her to the ailing fifty-seven-year-old Blackmore. As his sixth wife, Debbie became a stepmother to Blackmore's thirty-one kids, most of whom were older than she was. And because he happened to be the father of Debbie's own stepmother, Mem, she unwittingly became a stepmother to her stepmother, and thus a step grandmother to herself."
"(p. 53) Whether one believes that the faith he spawned is the world's only true religion or a preposterous fable, Joseph emerges from the fog of time as one of the most remarkable figures ever to have breathed American air. "Whatever his lapses," Harold Bloom argues in The American Religion, "Smith was an authentic religious genius, unique in our national history.... In proportion to his importance and his complexity, he remains the least-studied personage, of an undiminished vitality, in our entire national sage."
"(p. 77) For a person accustomed to the multi ethnic commotion of Los Angeles, Vancouver, New York, or even Denver, walking across the BYU campus can be a jarring experience. One sees no graffiti, not a speck of litter. More than 99 percent of the thirty thousand students are white. Each of the young Mormons one encounters is astonishingly well groomed and neatly dressed. Beards, tattoos, and pierced ears (or other body parts) are strictly forbidden for men. Immodest attire and more than a single piercing per ear are forbidden among women. Smoking, using profane language, and drinking alcohol or even coffee are likewise banned. Heeding the dictum "Cougars don't cut corners," students keep to the sidewalks as they hurry to make it to class on time; nobody would think of attempting to shave a few precious seconds by treading on the manicured grass. Everyone is cheerful, friendly, and unfailingly polite.
Most non-Mormons think of Salt Lake City as the geographic heart of Mormonism, but in fact half the population of Salt Lake is Gentile, and many Mormons regard the city as a sinful, iniquitous place that's been corrupted by outsiders. To the Saints themselves, the true Mormon heartland is here in Provo and surrounding Utah County--the site of chaste little towns like Highland, American Fork, Orem, Payson and Salem--where the population is nearly 90 percent LDS. The Sabbath is taken seriously in these parts. Almost all businesses close on Sundays, as do public swimming pools, even on the hottest days of the summer months.
This part of the state is demographically notable in other aspects, as well. The LDS Church forbids abortions, frowns on contraception, and teaches that Mormon couples have a sacred duty to give birth to as many children as they can support--which goes a long way toward explaining why Utah County has the highest birth rate in the United States; it is higher, in fact, than the birth rate in Bangladesh. This also happens to be the most Republican county in the most Republican state in the nation. Not coincidentally, Utah County is a stronghold not only of Mormonism but also Mormon Fundamentalism."
"(p. 208) Alleging that the Mormons had committed a long list of treasonous acts, in May 1857 Buchanan dispatched a contingent of federal officials to restore the rule of law in Utah, including a new territorial governor to replace Brigham Young. More ominously, the new president ordered twenty-five hundred heavily armed soldiers to escort these officials into Salt Lake City and subdue the Saints if necessary. For all intents and purposes, the United States had declared war on the Mormons."
"(p. 250 - quoting John Taylor) God is greater than the United States, and when the Government conflicts with heaven we will be ranged under the banner of heaven and against the government. The United States says we cannot marry more than one wife. God says different.... Polygamy is a divine institution. It has been handed down direct from God. The United States cannot abolish it. No nation on earth can prevent it, nor all the nations of the earth combined; these are my sentiments and all of you who sympathize with me in this position will raise your right hands. I defy the United States; I will obey God."
"(p. 334) I was irresistibly drawn to write about Latter-Day Saints not only because I already knew something about their theology, and admired much about their culture, but also because of the utterly unique circumstances in which their religion was born: the Mormon Church was founded a mere 173 years ago, in a literate society, in the age of the printing press. As a consequence, the creation of what became a worldwide faith was abundantly documented in firsthand accounts. Thanks to the Mormons, we have been given an unprecedented opportunity to appreciate--in astonishingly detail--how an important religion came to be."
What I'm Reading Now:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I read the first half of this book about 2 years ago. I didn't finish it, and would have rated it much lower than a B. It was long ago enough that my memories are fading, but my impressions are . . .
I felt the book often confused the line between LDS, FLDS and other polygamous groups. I found that he skipped from Joseph Smith church history to Colorado City very freely. I almost had trouble keeping them straight. I can't imagine how someone unfamiliar with the topics would ever separate what things did or did not apply to the LDS church.
As noted in my other comment on your main blog, I took exception with Krakauer's attempts to make topics seem as "wild" as possible. One example that sticks in my mind was when he recounted the visitation of Moroni to Joseph Smith. He states various times that Moroni appeared on the Autumnal Equinox each year. I was about to call him a liar until I went to look it up and it turns out the date of the event is indeed the 21st/22nd of September which is often the date of the Autumnal Equinox. Never in all my years had I heard someone equate the equinox with Moroni's visit. But by associating the two as the author does, he implies some sort of connection. I can't imagine why he would emphasize the connection as much as he does, but it felt to me that he was implying that Mormons believe that angels visit people when the sun is lined up with the Earth's equator. Clearly it's a silly religion! Further, I felt an unnecessary emphasis on reminding readers that many of the events surrounding the founding of the church aren't exactly verifiable. As intelligent readers, we realize that if you're talking about a visitation to Joseph, we're kinda taking Josephs word on it. Instead, it felt like the author phrased things more like: "Smith claimed that an angel magically appeared in his room to supposedly tell him scriptures which he could have just copied out of the bible and reportedly where the mystical golden book was hidden which Joseph gave back to the angel, rather than letting people see the book that he claimed to have."
(That is obviously an exaggeration, but you get my point. I just don't like his tone.)
I totally agree that he tries to make it difficult to decipher when he's writing about the LDS Church and when he's writing about a Fundamentalist group. It wouldn't be a surprise if he had intended to make the distinction vague.
I find it interesting the things that one person picks out of the book as compared to another. I don't remember him saying anything about the autumnal equinox and I'm sure in a couple years down the road my memories of the book will be different than they are right now. That's why I've got this blog I guess...
Tyler, you said:
"I never felt that this book was anti-Mormon, but quite the opposite in fact. . . . I felt that the author was only trying to be as unbiased as possible."
You then said:
"I totally agree that he tries to make it difficult to decipher when he's writing about the LDS Church and when he's writing about a Fundamentalist group. It wouldn't be a surprise if he had intended to make the distinction vague."
I don't really see how these two statement are compatible. An unbiased and pro-Mormon writer wouldn't intentionally confuse the LDS church with the fundamentalist groups. I am not necessarily calling the author anti-Mormon, but I would say that he is either a poor writer (accidental confusion of the different groups) or somewhat biased against the church, or some of both.
It's probably fairly obvious that I'm struggling to put my thoughts into words. I'll try and clarify what I meant: I really think that Krakauer was trying to give the Mormons a fair shake and in my opinion, he mostly succeeded. At the same time, there were facts that he got wrong and the distinction between the Mormons and Mormon Fundamentalists was often very foggy. Whether or not this was done on purpose doesn't change that the book seemed to be written in an unbiased manner (to me, that is).
I'm still probably contradicting myself, but like I said, I'm just having a tough time putting my thoughts into words.
Post a Comment